Jews in Economics
Every male, Jewish character becomes
ingrained, in some way, in economic markets. Mr Alf, one of recipients of a
letter from Lady Carbury, owns one of the morning papers. He can be very
curt in addressing issues and, in fact, was not overly receptive to Lady
Carbury’s letter. He did allow for a review of her book to be published, but
had set one of his “most sharp-nailed subordinates [to] set upon her book,
and had pulled it to pieces with almost rabid malignity” (Trollope, 83).
However, in the name of diplomacy, he does not take credit for the review in
Lady Carbury’s presence, though as the editor it would have been well within
his purview to print whatever he desired. He is also described a ruthless
and sarcastic, willing to be ambiguous enough to claim he was correct
regardless of the outcome of the situation (Trollope, 229). In his manner he
is just as callous and ruthless in the publishing market as Melmotte is in
the financial sphere. Alf differs from Melmotte in that his curse is not
maliciousness and greed, but rather pride and egoism. Despite this
difference he still appears to wear the mantle of the villainous or devious
Jew.
Mr Melmotte’s association with the financial market differs significantly
than that of Mr Alf’s. His work is more dramatic and through rumor and
stereotyping, comes to resemble a variation on the Blood Libel theme in a
number of ways. When Roger Carbury thinks of Melmotte, he reveals, “People
said of him that he had framed and carried out long premeditated and deeply
laid schemes for the ruin of those who had trusted him, that he had
swallowed up property of all who had come in contact with him, that he was
fed with the blood of widows and
children” [emphasis added]
(Trollope, 61). Roger Carbury is using rumors of his financial dealings to
draw conclusions about Melmotte’s character. Based on what others have told
him he comes to the conclusion that Melmotte is not to be trusted with money
and that he is conniving, manipulative, and greedy. This is the stereotype
that is passed on from the days of usury in medieval times: the greedy Jew
that lives off the work of other people and swindles them out of their money
by charging interest.
This rumor goes beyond the basic stereotyping of the greedy Jew to push
these statements into the Blood Libelous territory. By implying that this
money comes from the “blood of widows and children” it becomes directly
associated with the vampirism of blood libel, predatory and calculating
attack on others’ money and livelihoods. Unlike the true Blood Libel rumor
the blood consumed here is metaphoric representing the blood, sweat, and
tears of hard work. Much like Melmotte’s negotiation between actual and
rumored Jewishness, other rumors surrounding Melmotte negotiate a middle
territory between the literal and figurative blood lust transforming it into
something closer to financial ruthlessness. In the financial realm Jews
become not just viciously greedy, but violently so. They are willing to
sacrifice the lives of others for their own personal gain.